M MyDixieWrecked Well-Known Member Joined Mar 27, 2006 Messages 762 Location Puyallup Jun 11, 2007 #1 what year did they start puttin the 4.3 in the s-10's?
crash2 -Oh no I picked a side- Joined Mar 26, 2001 Messages 39,839 Location Da gold bar Jun 11, 2007 #2 MyDixieWrecked said: what year did they start puttin the 4.3 in the s-10's? Click to expand... Officially in 88--but you can find some late year 87's tbi 88-94 (I have found a fre 95's with tbi) 92-95 cpi 96- scpi
MyDixieWrecked said: what year did they start puttin the 4.3 in the s-10's? Click to expand... Officially in 88--but you can find some late year 87's tbi 88-94 (I have found a fre 95's with tbi) 92-95 cpi 96- scpi
CrustyJeep Well-Known Member Joined Mar 27, 2006 Messages 20,149 Location Brewery Jun 11, 2007 #3 4.3 liter v-6's are inherently inferior to 300+ cubic inch v-8's. Wait...... What was the question?? :flipoff:
4.3 liter v-6's are inherently inferior to 300+ cubic inch v-8's. Wait...... What was the question?? :flipoff:
M MyDixieWrecked Well-Known Member Joined Mar 27, 2006 Messages 762 Location Puyallup Jun 11, 2007 #4 CrustyJeep said: 4.3 liter v-6's are inherently inferior to 300+ cubic inch v-8's. Click to expand... x2 but:kissmyass: my foots heavy enough with a 22re :cheer: Thanks Crash thats what i was looking for
CrustyJeep said: 4.3 liter v-6's are inherently inferior to 300+ cubic inch v-8's. Click to expand... x2 but:kissmyass: my foots heavy enough with a 22re :cheer: Thanks Crash thats what i was looking for