-
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
rockwell width with 43s
- Thread starter ratedX
- Start date
Mine is 95" with 10" wide double beadlocks and 5" backspacing.
Nuts
Well-Known Member
How much of a pain is it to squeeze around in the woods at 95"-97" wide?
Nuts said:
It's not as bad as you'd think if you front-dig through the trails. Mine is 122" WB and I follow Jeeps everywhere they go.
Nuts
Well-Known Member
Looks like mine will end up about 97" wide and I'm counting on the rear steer to get me through the woods, just wondered how everyone else delt with the width. 
bgredjeep
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 719
- Reaction score
- 57
My buddy has an M&M buggy on rocks w/ hubs out, originally on 42, and now 47s. It's wide but he did ok getting around on the trails. There were a lot of multi-point turns and "special" lines taken to get that monster through the trails. He just added rear steer and it was much easier to maneuver through the trails. Once he gets a feel for driving with the rear steer it should be bad ass. For now it helps get around much easier, and probably gets him a little mixed up on the trails as he's never had it before.
Re: Re: Re: rockwell width with 43s
hook a rear tire on a tree and give it some gas. My daughters call it Tree steering.Nuts said:Looks like mine will end up about 97" wide and I'm counting on the rear steer to get me through the woods, just wondered how everyone else delt with the width.
