• Help Support Hardline Crawlers :

square vs round

rockmike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2006
Messages
574
Reaction score
0
Location
pasco,wa
Im getting ready to buy some link material for my build.I was looking for some opinions on useing 2"x.250 wall square for my bottom links vs 2"x.250 dom round.Ive been quoted $4.45 per foot for square vs $11.70 per foot for the dom.Big saveings useing the square.Discuss please,thanks Mike.
 
had square on my last rig and it worked great. I dont know if you could bend it. it just looks booty fab though


:cool:
 
Those links made that rig fall over all the time :D

I have seen square links work, just never looked right to me
 
Im concidering useing the 2'' .250 wall square and put a slight bend on them close the axle end then fish plate them at the bend for extra strength to gain extra link clearance.

What do you guys think of doing that?
 
Im concidering useing the 2'' .250 wall square and put a slight bend on them close the axle end then fish plate them at the bend for extra strength to gain extra link clearance.

What do you guys think of doing that?

they kinda protect your driveline a bit ??
 
Been searching my arse off and found this.

According to a quick force analysis the round would be better. I did a quick and dirty analysis in cosmos of 2 inch 1/4 wall round and square. Subjected both to a 50000N load which is rediculous for what they would see in crawling. The round had a 12.5% better factor of safety than the square. Both failed, but I expected that with the force I was putting them under. This is with the force applied at the center of a 36 inch link. This is also assuming that the force is directly into the links not at an angle. The round wouldn't care about the angle, but thee square would getter weaker as the force became more angled towards the corners.
 
I have a bunch of 1 3/4 3/8ths wall dom for 12.50 a foot if yer interested...PM me if so.
 
Been searching my arse off and found this.

According to a quick force analysis the round would be better. I did a quick and dirty analysis in cosmos of 2 inch 1/4 wall round and square. Subjected both to a 50000N load which is rediculous for what they would see in crawling. The round had a 12.5% better factor of safety than the square. Both failed, but I expected that with the force I was putting them under. This is with the force applied at the center of a 36 inch link. This is also assuming that the force is directly into the links not at an angle. The round wouldn't care about the angle, but thee square would getter weaker as the force became more angled towards the corners.

Round is constant strength at all angles--where square is not.
 
Been searching my arse off and found this.

According to a quick force analysis the round would be better. I did a quick and dirty analysis in cosmos of 2 inch 1/4 wall round and square. Subjected both to a 50000N load which is rediculous for what they would see in crawling. The round had a 12.5% better factor of safety than the square. Both failed, but I expected that with the force I was putting them under. This is with the force applied at the center of a 36 inch link. This is also assuming that the force is directly into the links not at an angle. The round wouldn't care about the angle, but thee square would getter weaker as the force became more angled towards the corners.


sounds good, 2" seemed a bit small to me when you mentioned that.. good luck with your build:;
 
I think the other issue with square is the tube insert, last year grama ripped his **** apart on the outlet mall. I run 2inch 120wall sleeved over 1.75ich 250wall dom tube and they have held up very well but the next level is heat treated cromo.
 
Back
Top