• Help Support Hardline Crawlers :

stupid question

monsteryota

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2007
Messages
58
Location
Spanaway
i know it is most likely a stupid question but i dont know it so i am going to ask it i am trying to get the whole flex thing going and so i have a log and it has a 2x4 screwed to it and i tryed rolling up it and then getting out and measuring fromt eh top of the tire and the top of the wheel well and it was within a half of a inch so how is this supossed to work and be done thanks dustin i am using a 89 toyota 4x4 std cab short bed
 
If you are trying to get a "score", you need and RTI ramp that is set to a certain amount of degrees. Go to an offroad shop and see if they have one.
 
Just wheel the damn thing and call me when you'r ready for a SAS:D

Then you can talk flex.
 
actually guys, ifs flexes ten times better than leafs, it just doesnt flex as far as leafs do. the whole principle behind ifs is that it makes the rid smoother and more car like by allowing more suspension flex. but yah ifs will never match what leafs or solid axle with coils can do.
 
:wtf:wow, you totally just contradicted yourself, in the same sentence. :awesomework:

ifs flexes ten times better than leafs, it just doesnt flex as far as leafs do....ifs will never match what leafs or solid axle with coils can do.

and you are wrong. IFS stands for indemendant front suspension, which means that the front corners can flex independantly of each other. yes, it was designed to make the ride smoother, for example, if you hit a bump at speed with the RF tire, it will absorb it, and the LF corner wont hardly move, as opposed to a solid axle, where when the RF tire hits the bump and rises over it, the suspension pushes the truck upwards, and allowing the LF suspension to droop, so that when you come down off the bump, you have the rebound from the RF suspension pushing up, and the LF compressing and then rebounding, which of course makes for a rougher ride.
 
Last edited:
:wtf:wow, you totally just contradicted yourself, in the same sentence. :awesomework:



and you are wrong. IFS stands for indemendant front suspension, which means that the front corners can flex independantly of each other. yes, it was designed to make the ride smoother, for example, if you hit a bump at speed with the RF tire, it will absorb it, and the LF corner wont hardly move, as opposed to a solid axle, where when the RF tire hits the bump and rises over it, the suspension pushes the truck upwards, and allowing the LF suspension to droop, so that when you come down off the bump, you have the rebound from the RF suspension pushing up, and the LF compressing and then rebounding.

ifs is still gay
 
:wtf:wow, you totally just contradicted yourself, in the same sentence. :awesomework:



and you are wrong. IFS stands for indemendant front suspension, which means that the front corners can flex independantly of each other. yes, it was designed to make the ride smoother, for example, if you hit a bump at speed with the RF tire, it will absorb it, and the LF corner wont hardly move, as opposed to a solid axle, where when the RF tire hits the bump and rises over it, the suspension pushes the truck upwards, and allowing the LF suspension to droop, so that when you come down off the bump, you have the rebound from the RF suspension pushing up, and the LF compressing and then rebounding, which of course makes for a rougher ride.

*cough* unsprung weight *cough*


Stop thinking so hard.
 
:IFS stands for indemendant front suspension,

I'm thinking you wanted to type "Independent Front Suspension".
However you would still have gotten it wrong.
What you should have typed to be correct is: "Inferior Front Suspension"

Ya I know:awesomework:
 
:wtf:wow, you totally just contradicted yourself, in the same sentence. :awesomework:



and you are wrong. IFS stands for indemendant front suspension, which means that the front corners can flex independantly of each other. yes, it was designed to make the ride smoother, for example, if you hit a bump at speed with the RF tire, it will absorb it, and the LF corner wont hardly move, as opposed to a solid axle, where when the RF tire hits the bump and rises over it, the suspension pushes the truck upwards, and allowing the LF suspension to droop, so that when you come down off the bump, you have the rebound from the RF suspension pushing up, and the LF compressing and then rebounding, which of course makes for a rougher ride.

re read that, i didnt contradict my self at all. IFS stands for independant front suspension for starters. if ifs doesnt flex better than a solid axle than why do they use them on stadium trucks and what not, because ifs can take a good flexing.

the very principle of ifs means that it does flex better because it doesnt have to counter act the other corner. it just does not flex as far as leaves do(that is not a contradiction)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top