• Help Support Hardline Crawlers :

How wide are you

I have a toyota on 38.5X16X15 on toyota axles. It is 78 inches bulge to bulge.

I have a 67 chevy on rockwells and 53 inch tires. It is 88 inches bulge to bulge.

I have a buggy on rockwells and 44 inch TSLs. It is 93 inches bulge to bulge.
 
CHOP SHOP said:
I have a toyota on 38.5X16X15 on toyota axles. It is 78 inches bulge to bulge.

I have a 67 chevy on rockwells and 53 inch tires. It is 88 inches bulge to bulge.

I have a buggy on rockwells and 44 inch TSLs. It is 93 inches bulge to bulge.
Click to expand...

You my friend spend far too much time with Odie!:FU1:
 
nowires said:
Your under
I am just gathering info and stats for DNR


Let me revise the questian if you are over 85" .

What is you setup?
Axles Stock or modified
wheel BS
Spacers
Could you get it close to 85" without major work?
Click to expand...

Thanks, I did go to the Stoage today, so I took a tape and checked it just in case I wanted to post it here fo ryou.

I am 79 front and rear
 
Why would they need a width restriction of around 85" ? Was it a recommendation made by a member of the planning committee ? A 98" wide trail is just as easy to build and maintain as a narrower trail, so there are no benefits. Usually trail width corridors are 20-30 feet so there could be a hard line and a bypass both 98" wide and still be in the corridor. And having multi use trails, it will allow dirt bikes and other ATVs to pick the best line for the rider.



Attention anyone who drives a exo cage Toyota, tube chassis buggy, fullsize Blazer, Bronco, pickup or "non jeep type vehicles"

You need to let the Reiter ORV park planning commission know that you will be an active user of the new trail system and you do not want to be excluded!
 
Last edited:
Width restrictions---never a fun subject and something we should never have to argu over IMO...
 
crash said:
Width restrictions---never a fun subject and something we should never have to argu over IMO...
Click to expand...

I spent a couple hours this morning reading back thru over 80 pages of ancient restriction related issues/threads.

Holy blame games! No fun at all. Even though the majority are againts them.

Strong thoughts for sure:awesomework:
 
CHOP SHOP said:
I spent a couple hours this morning reading back thru over 80 pages of ancient restriction related issues/threads.

Holy blame games! No fun at all. Even though the majority are againts them.

Strong thoughts for sure:awesomework:
Click to expand...

I can understand the need for it on some stuff. But its just a HUGE mess to deal with.
 
Hi All:

Charlie, my trail junk is 68 inches wide in the front, 70 inches in the rear. 100 inch wheelbase.

Regards,

Alan


nowires said:
What is the width of your rig from outside tire to outside of tire
Click to expand...
 
Crazy Daze said:
Why would they need a width restriction of around 85" ? Was it a recommendation made by a member of the planning committee ?
Click to expand...

No it is coming down from up top. I just picked 85" to slow down the post and see how many rigs are over 85"
 
Charlie, I think its great that you are planning ahead for this. This is a perfect opportunity to build "new" trails that suit the needs of the newer wider rigs. :awesomework:
 

Latest posts

Random media

elbe hillz jan 2011 092.jpg
2BA8B82E-2853-4E38-BD42-11719224C9D5.jpeg
_facebook_1503359623175_1503359628455.jpg
20150703_182056.jpg
20141226_185323.jpg
12-20-08 034.jpg
IMG_0114.jpeg
elbe120309 002.jpg
axlebreak (Small).jpg
Back
Top