patooyee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 5,692
- Reaction score
- 0
2" 6061 round bad, 36" long = 11 lbs.
2" 7075 round bar, 36" long = 11.4 lbs.
2" x 1/4" wall DOM, 36" long = 14 lbs.
2" x .188" wall DOM, 36" long = 10.9 lbs.
2" x .120" wall DOM, 36" long = 7.2 lbs. (Chromo in the same thickness won't be much different.)
I don't think anyone would debate the strength of a 1/4 wall DOM for an upper link, correct? (Whether it's stronger than 6061 or 7075 is irrelevant since I think we all agree that it is more than strong enough for the application.)
I don't think anyone would debate that the threads in just about any steel are stronger and more resistant to wear than 6061 or 7075, right?
It's been a long time since I've priced 1/4 wall DOM but I'm fairly sure that is is cheaper than 6061 round and even more certain cheaper than 7075 round, correct? And its only 2.6 lbs heavier per link, or 10.4 lbs heavier across the entire rig.
So why risk any strength for such a small loss of weight and large increase of price? Seems to me that there really isn't a place for aluminum upper links on any rig in that case.
Or if you're willing to accept .120 wall chromo HT, which I think is going to be about on the same price level as the 7075, you are gaining about 4 lbs per link and losing thread wear characteristics for no gains anywhere at all other than to say you have blingy aluminum links. Again, no place for aluminum uppers unless you just want to sacrifice performance for bling.
Or consider .188 wall DOM as a median between .25 and .120. at slightly less weight compared to aluminum, probably lower price, it's going to have better thread wear characteristics and probably more than strong enough for 99.9999% of rigs for the uppers.
Finally, this was all just keeping OD the same. But if you keep ID the same instead (So that you can use the same weld-in inserts.) the OD actually goes down. That brings the weight of the steels down as well. .120 wall comes down to 1.75 OD which is 6.3 lbs per link (making it the lightest of all the options) and .188 wall comes down to 1-7/8 OD which is 10.2 lbs per link, making the weight savings of steel over aluminum even better with only strength gains and cost savings. (Granted, 1-7/8 x .188 wall DOM is probably a bugger to find. Speedymetals.com does list it though.)
(And I'm sorry to anyone that had to read this multiple times, I had to go back and correct typos like 15 times! )
2" 7075 round bar, 36" long = 11.4 lbs.
2" x 1/4" wall DOM, 36" long = 14 lbs.
2" x .188" wall DOM, 36" long = 10.9 lbs.
2" x .120" wall DOM, 36" long = 7.2 lbs. (Chromo in the same thickness won't be much different.)
I don't think anyone would debate the strength of a 1/4 wall DOM for an upper link, correct? (Whether it's stronger than 6061 or 7075 is irrelevant since I think we all agree that it is more than strong enough for the application.)
I don't think anyone would debate that the threads in just about any steel are stronger and more resistant to wear than 6061 or 7075, right?
It's been a long time since I've priced 1/4 wall DOM but I'm fairly sure that is is cheaper than 6061 round and even more certain cheaper than 7075 round, correct? And its only 2.6 lbs heavier per link, or 10.4 lbs heavier across the entire rig.
So why risk any strength for such a small loss of weight and large increase of price? Seems to me that there really isn't a place for aluminum upper links on any rig in that case.
Or if you're willing to accept .120 wall chromo HT, which I think is going to be about on the same price level as the 7075, you are gaining about 4 lbs per link and losing thread wear characteristics for no gains anywhere at all other than to say you have blingy aluminum links. Again, no place for aluminum uppers unless you just want to sacrifice performance for bling.
Or consider .188 wall DOM as a median between .25 and .120. at slightly less weight compared to aluminum, probably lower price, it's going to have better thread wear characteristics and probably more than strong enough for 99.9999% of rigs for the uppers.
Finally, this was all just keeping OD the same. But if you keep ID the same instead (So that you can use the same weld-in inserts.) the OD actually goes down. That brings the weight of the steels down as well. .120 wall comes down to 1.75 OD which is 6.3 lbs per link (making it the lightest of all the options) and .188 wall comes down to 1-7/8 OD which is 10.2 lbs per link, making the weight savings of steel over aluminum even better with only strength gains and cost savings. (Granted, 1-7/8 x .188 wall DOM is probably a bugger to find. Speedymetals.com does list it though.)
(And I'm sorry to anyone that had to read this multiple times, I had to go back and correct typos like 15 times! )