I will be addressing that at the same time Just need a set of headers
Matt O. said:Bryan said they were getting huge gains with the cams. Like 50-75 ft lbs of torque. He said it is the most bang for the buck on these motors.
lance4351 said:I love my 6.0 its pepper.gif
lance4351 said:I love my 6.0 its pepper.gif
Cole said:Yeah but its not really a 6.0 any more.
lance4351 said:Why because of the k&n
lance4351 said:Why because of the k&n
BlueTurd said:Hey MattO, Bryan did not do my motor. Me and my brother (damnitboy) did the work on my motor but Cole did the exhuast when he had the jeep. There is quite a bit that Jim can do the computer. He turned the fuel up a bunch, played with the timing and the TPS sensor and some more that I probably wouldn't understand. The research that I did on the injectors was performance wise they would not help that much. I was told to buy them if I was having trouble with them but if the factory injectors were runnin ok save my money. The #s on the cam are way different between 1.5 and 1.6 rockers. I did 1.6 rollers. We will probably be in Garendale in Feb. if you want to look and listen. Hope this helps.
Matt O. said:Do you have part numbers or info on the Ramjet cam?
millerxc said:I found out a stock 5.7 vortec will not last long against the rev limiter, ovaled some rods in mine and instead of going back stock I did the 383 using Eagle rotating assy, and put a GMPP cam with roller rockers and a little more comp than stock, and had the comp tuned, overall spent about 1300$, definately makes more than stock but I'm a little dissappointed, I've always run BBC and this motor still has no low end, I am going to put a little stall conv to see if that helps cause it is real strong in the mid, overall it is probably the last SBC I'll use in a 4x4.
Woodlee said:Mine was better than yours then. I used to sit on the limiter on mine just because I was young and thought it was funny. Those motors are usualy there for the long haul.