powdr7 said:Lets see smaller tires a lot of the time means more throttle...so that would just be hurting themselves.
BULLSHIT.
white txt -pfffttttt
powdr7 said:Lets see smaller tires a lot of the time means more throttle...so that would just be hurting themselves.
This is a very true statement. The guys with big meats do some damage, but I dont know how many times I see a small tire, non locked rig trying over and over again to make an obsticle he cannot make tearing up the trail. Then you take a well equipped rig, that doesnt even spin a tire through the same obsticle. I am not opposed to smaller tires, BUT this is not the answer. More people on the trail equals more trail erosion, BOTTOM LINE. Again I am not bashing the smaller tire guys.powdr7 said:Lets see smaller tires a lot of the time means more throttle...so that would just be hurting themselves.
PORTER said:This is a very true statement. The guys with big meats do some damage, but I dont know how many times I see a small tire, non locked rig trying over and over again to make an obsticle he cannot make tearing up the trail.
I wish they would leave us the fawk alone as its an ORV trail, not a freeway system. Its supposed to be torn up and difficult. My .02Dude said:I agree, I am not a big tire club guy, but have been to a 36 at least on a XJ.
I try 3 times and if I can't make it, pull cable/rope and move on. Or use my head and stack or what ever if I don't have a winch. If I personally have to stack I also undo the help I created for the big guys. :;
PORTER said:I wish they would leave us the fawk alone as its an ORV trail, not a freeway system. Its supposed to be torn up and difficult. My .02
Rock_Crusher said:Amen...............
Orv
as long as the trail is maintained & managed & kept clean............
WTF is the problem?
PORTER said:This is a very true statement. The guys with big meats do some damage, but I dont know how many times I see a small tire, non locked rig trying over and over again to make an obsticle he cannot make tearing up the trail. Then you take a well equipped rig, that doesnt even spin a tire through the same obsticle. I am not opposed to smaller tires, BUT this is not the answer. More people on the trail equals more trail erosion, BOTTOM LINE. Again I am not bashing the smaller tire guys.
Dude said:and BTW: Pokey, I need to rejoin, were can I find a Tri Power on the east side for the app. I would be region 1.
Dude said:I guess to combat the movement we all better get involved in PNW4WDA, they are a force over there, even if you don't like the PNW.
and BTW: Pokey, I need to rejoin, were can I find a Tri Power on the east side for the app. I would be region 1.
Dude said:face it, it is all about the driver.
wheeling has advanced so much in the last 10 years that the forest service guys are probably seeing full on rigs with 49's and 56's the norm in the future.
I think Robin scared them. :haha: :haha: :haha: :clappy:
I guess to combat the movement we all better get involved in PNW4WDA, they are a force over there, even if you don't like the PNW.
and BTW: Pokey, I need to rejoin, were can I find a Tri Power on the east side for the app. I would be region 1.
wheelinjp said:The old school jeepers do go consistantly and get their ideas in there.
pokey said:http://www.pnw4wda.org/membership/index.htm
or pm me your address and I can mail it to you:cheer:
edit: damn I am slow
Travis said:I hope that's not where a tire size limitation idea came from.
Those that represent us at the forest service need to represent everyone, just not their personal interests. If they aren't (and I am not saying they are doing this) it's just going to drive a wedge between us all.
But, all this said - I guess no one has heard where this story is coming from. I have been unable to find it anywhere online.