tallnate
Well-Known Member
POR said:Just up backdoor
haha true!
POR said:Just up backdoor
I asked that of a Interco rep as well as why the 38 or 38.5 SX isn't offered in a 17. She said the main issue is expense of mold for the 17 and the cost of shooting "sticky" compound. I think a 38x12.5 / 17 or 38.5x14.5/17 sticky would be the best tire ever madesocsmm6 said:off subject but why have they not made a smaller sx sticky?
The machining cost of a tire mold is a LOT.Beerj said:I never understood that. The bigger the rim size, the less rubber, though higher price. There must be a lot more to making tires than i imagined.
jordan7118 said:I think a 38x12.5 / 17 or 38.5x14.5/17 sticky would be the best tire ever made
Beerj said:I never understood that. The bigger the rim size, the less rubber, though higher price. There must be a lot more to making tires than i imagined.
Cole said:It's an extremely complex procedure. Their are so many steps and products into building big tires, most people have no idea. A lot of people think you just pour rubber into mold but its a lot harder than that and very physical work.
Yes but is it that much of a difference in cost between machining a 17" mold as apposed to a 15"?TBItoy said:The machining cost of a tire mold is a LOT.
It may just be the capital to put into having another mold built. You would think they could funnel some of the profit from the sales of 43" SX to fund a mold for the 38/38.5 SX for a 17" wheel???Beerj said:Yes but is it that much of a difference in cost between machining a 17" mold as apposed to a 15"?
Cole said:It's an extremely complex procedure. Their are so many steps and products into building big tires, most people have no idea. A lot of people think you just pour rubber into mold but its a lot harder than that and very physical work.
AllGoNoShow said:Could you elaborate? I am curious.
redneckengineered said:I know you've stated before that BFG doesn't give a rip about making a legit 42" rock tire (current 42" Krawler doesn't count) but you think this would light a fire under them?
AllGoNoShow said:Could you elaborate? I am curious.
Cole said:No I don't think it will influence them at all because no trophy truck is going to run them and there will be very few ultra4 cars that run them. They can't keep them together with 39s let alone 42s. I would almost bet that a 42" Trep would weigh more than a 43" SX
jordan7118 said:It may just be the capital to put into having another mold built. You would think they could funnel some of the profit from the sales of 43" SX to fund a mold for the 38/38.5 SX for a 17" wheel???
I don't know how tire molds work, but it would be cool / smart / financially efficient if they had a mold with different inserts or tooling to be able to swap out just the portion of the mold that dictates rim size.
Cole, can you offer any intel on mold design or how that works? Can you swap pieces out of a mold to go to different wheel sizes, or have to build a whole new mold?
Wouldn't it be cheaper to adjust your suspension?kushKrawlin said:Depending on the price I would possibly try to sell mine now and get these tires. The extra ground clearance would be nice. And I will always believe with all of my heart that the 40" trep is the best all-around tire.. NOT for out west where it's all rock ( reds for the win) and not a **** ton of muddy conditions all the time(PROB 43"SX) But I truly believe that it is the best tire made for where we wheel and they type of wheelin most of us do, but honestly then again they're all bad ass tires! . Of course depending on the weight that would have a big impact on my decision. I'm really interested to know the price and weight though. The ONLY reason I considered maybe selling or trading for some 43's because of the ground clearance.
redneckengineered said:Kinda thought so. If it's heavier than a 43 SX that will suck ass.
tallnate said:Looks like a 40/13.50/17 trep weighs 99lbs and a 43/14.50/17 SX weighs 123lbs so yeah it will be close. I'm guessing their new 42" trep will weigh slightly less than the SX, probably somewhere in the 115-120lb range. We'll see.
One thing's for sure, Interco is selling the crap out of their 43 sticky. I can only assume that Maxxis is coming out with a 42 to compete with interco for those wanting a good all around sticky tire larger than 40" I'd like to see bfg join the party as well and develop a new 42/17 red label crawler. I bet the trailer park panty dropper buggy would love to be running a new set of 42/17 red labels if they were an option.
Thought they make 42" reds.tallnate said:Looks like a 40/13.50/17 trep weighs 99lbs and a 43/14.50/17 SX weighs 123lbs so yeah it will be close. I'm guessing their new 42" trep will weigh slightly less than the SX, probably somewhere in the 115-120lb range. We'll see.
One thing's for sure, Interco is selling the crap out of their 43 sticky. I can only assume that Maxxis is coming out with a 42 to compete with interco for those wanting a good all around sticky tire larger than 40" I'd like to see bfg join the party as well and develop a new 42/17 red label crawler. I bet the trailer park panty dropper buggy would love to be running a new set of 42/17 red labels if they were an option.
Mortalis5509 said:Thought they make 42" reds.