Juan_Hong_Loe
That's dumb
InDaShop said:The value of the dollar isn't worth a cup of piss.
Unless your Cole. He pisses Haterade!
InDaShop said:The value of the dollar isn't worth a cup of piss.
I seriously doubt we could boycott oil. Okay, we drill our reserves. that doesn't happen overnight and this country is so dependant on oil (thanks oil rich policy makers protecting your own interests) that it would take some time to get our infrastructure so that we could really keep up with our own demand. Also, opec isn't ****ed if we cut them off. there are still those 2 other 1+ billion population countries buying that **** and driving our price up, and a myriad of smaller countries vieing for it too. Why is scrap up, oh yeah, they're buying all that too.MUCHADO said:I say we all boycott oil..... the economics of that would **** opec..... supply and demand.. if we don't use any, then they are ****ed.
and dammit let us drill alaska and in the gulf!!!
wish there were a simple solution
1TONZR2 said:will this affect anything? http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00953020080520?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=22&sp=true
W is right to want to veto. how ****ing stupid. this is gonna get real bad1TONZR2 said:will this affect anything? http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00953020080520?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=22&sp=true
InDaShop said:Additionally, I read this morning that all these countries that energy subsidize (Malaysia, India, etc...) are ending their programs at these levels.
they subsidize consumption.blacksheep10 said:p beat me to it.
energy subsidize. meaning they pay those to conserve or burn?
yep thats it. Not OPEC though. Just government helping keep the cost down.blacksheep10 said:holy ****, pay to burn huh. why is that program in place, or you mean opec was subsidizing. I can't imagine a country wanting to pay its users to burn more. then again, I can't imagine wanting to pay farmers to not farm