boardbysled
Tree Nerd.
Good job guys!:cheer:
And those damn'd single trackers
And those damn'd single trackers
oh and this is new, some on has made a short cut threw the switch backs. looks kind of fun but didnt have time to block it off
I'd say a better approach would be to make it a SUSTAINABLE OPTION to the switch-back.:awesomework:
That's 25' of trail that could be put somewhere else more fun.....Block that ****!....Besides people just need to learn to not be so stupid and do crap like that.
I'm not talking directly at you OilCan......your post just makes a good discussion topic.:beer:
It's not new and blocking this cut-off is POINTLESS. And I'd imagine that more folks use it to go down than up. When you drive up it, the tree on the right intrudes on your A-pillar.:;Ask me how I know.
I'd say a better approach would be to make it a SUSTAINABLE OPTION to the switch-back.:awesomework:
hey what the heck im locked front and rear, what did he do break my rig. im going to have a talk with that boy......:stirpot::haha:
Going up the switch backs, there's like 10 miles of right turn on the first corner... the 2nd one, if you place your tires right, one shot--no backing up required!!! Coming down is usually only a 2 point turn.
I agree though, people can't seem to be able to leave the trail the way it was originally designed ...That shortcut never used to be an issue with popping up until ...... ......
With no PS pump its not easy to make those switch backs... im just sayin... :stirpot:
What would I do there? Well, I've had this idea of a cement block stepup obsticle, and that would be a good place for it...:stirpot:
I run ARB's on both my rigs, so tight corners aren't the issue for me, as they can be for some. If blocking it is the agreed solutionplease don't tease the would-be by-passers with logs. Do something more permanent!:awesomework:
problem is charlie, that right below this section, there ARE already two spots that would allow for 6 rigs (or more) to get by each other....and you can see them both while going up or down thru the switchbacks....
EDIT: that said, still doesn't mean it can't be a viable option for those who choose not to follow the original path...need the powers that be to make that decision though...
x2 right bellow that switch back the trail is wide and has a split that goes around a small group of trees, plenty of room to pass. infact if you come straight down the bypass you end up taking the second route..
there is 100% no doubt in my mind (not that this matters) that the bypass was made to avoid the switchback... on some of the switchbacks at walker i know i get my rig to the point where i only have oposite corners on the ground (front passanger and rear driver) and i am teatering. this is the only way my rig can get to a point able to even do a 3 or 5 pt turn.....
solution if allowed:
we still have a nice pile of the larger then hand size rock at the begining of the trail. i assume it is the extra from when the work was being done around the bridge on the mainline earlier this year.... if we can get a couple loads of 2" minus from one of the quarries and some of that larger rock we could hard pack that bypass quick and easy.. if DNR is for it and rick is down for using the buggy and trailer he can get around the switchback and we can dump from the top down.. just an idea
:awesomework:
.. if DNR is for it and rick is down for using the buggy and trailer he can get around the switchback and we can dump from the top down..