smbroady82
Well-Known Member
Casey said:If I had your money I would...
Well hey there stranger!!
Casey said:If I had your money I would...
WAts up Brother? Man drop some coin on a 5.3!! Best/worst thing I ever did! You going to shamrock?smbroady82 said:Well hey there stranger!!
onetoncrawler said:6.0 or 6.2 for sure, you're going to spend a lot in the end so do it right.
Car intake or aftermarket intake
Oil pan or at least baffle kit
Wiring harness cut down and tune
Accessory brackets
Locking dip stick
I'm sure I'm forgetting things but that is the basics
Eddyj said:Pretty sad when the most entertaining thread is a 5.3 / 6.0 debate.
#uppermiddleclassproblems
#lsswaptheworld
#woopow
#CHM
#LSconnection
#ecotecHAHA
#350hpain'tenough
#besomebody
#beSMBROADY
Casey said:WAts up Brother? Man drop some coin on a 5.3!! Best/worst thing I ever did! You going to shamrock?
kmcminn said:While talking to the guru when I ordered some parts. I was told the truck intakes flow good and a swap wasnt nessacary.
The car intakes are definetly more aesthetically pleasing. Not 100 percent a have to swap part from knowledge that has been passed down to me. Im sure there are some dyno numbers that may solidfy one way or the other though.
Another question. On the 5.3 or 6.0 is the alternator in the way? Is that the reason for wanting to change the accessory bracket change? Maybe just cause they are ugly.
Good thread.
onetoncrawler said:Agree, most folks with buggies can't get by with truck intakes unless you want to look around the side of it. And unless you run a cover they look terrible.
On the brackets , most folks will run an aftermarket pump so there's a new bracket and I have always wanted to get rid of the huge aluminum factory stuff for looks, again not 100% necessary but if your engine is exposed it will totally affect how clean the buggy looks
pholmann said:I'd say go 5.3 for your budgets sake. If you choose to upgrade later you can sell the 5.3 and your harness will swap right over to the new 6.0 as long as you stay with a gen 3. I personally think the 5.3's are a little tougher and have better longevity than the 6.0's. With a good cam and tune you will be high 300's to nearly 400hp with the 5.3. There is a lot of power that can be unlocked in the tune itself. I know there's a ton of idiots out there that have a cam and a tune and have 500hp with a 300k mile 5.3 but here's some real numbers for ya.
2002 5.3 bored .030 over, factory heads with larger intake valves and some porting (which was a waste of time according to the flow bench). Comp thumpr camshaft. This is a zero mile motor and was rebuilt by a professional. We are tuning it on the engine dyno. These numbers aren't finished but close to what we're gonna get out of it. Keep in mind that no two dynos give the same exact numbers but you get the idea. I'll post my numbers on my motor when I tear down for powder coat.
pholmann said:My motor is basically a 6.0 version of that 5.3. Mines a .030 over lq9 with a very comparable cam, no porting, good valve job, lightly cut heads and block, bigger injectors and a good dyno tune. I'm dying to know what my crank power is.