• Help Support Hardline Crawlers :

DOM vs. Moly

DHR Motorsports

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2009
Messages
428
Location
Centralia Wa.
Why don't people use moly in for their cages??

You can be lighter while keeping the same strength??

Not doggin' on DOM but just curious that with people spending so much money on their rigs now days why not use cromoly.

Just curious as nobody uses DOM in drag racing apps and here are a few shots of my friend Spiro Pappas crashing yesterday in bradenton.

Testament to moly's strength and a well built car as he walked away...

Photos......

http://www.streetlegaltv.com/forum/spiro-pappas-horrible-wreck-nmca-florida-2379.html#post5292

Video.....

http://video.streetlegaltv.com/video_detail.php?mId=8504
 
You still would want the wall thickness in all the rockrash area's IMO.
Definetly could go lighter elser where though.

I'd say its mostly a $ thing.
 
This chit cracks me up.:haha:

DOM is HREW DOM...same stuff only drawn...as long as you are in the 1020 and above carbon range.

And "moly" (chromium-molybdenum) comes as (an example) 4130 DOM.

But for a layman cage DOM(1020) should be strong enough at 80kPSI,,,,the 4130 gets you to 100kPSI. That last bit doesn't merrit the extra cash IMO.
 
Going out on a limb here, but part of it might also be the general use.

Race cars are kind of a one-time-use cage. Its there to protect you if all hell breaks loose, and it pretty much a goner at that time. Did its job, now its done. If it deforms a little, or gets tweaked, that's actually OK cause that is absorbing energy and impact that your body is not. In this case, light(er) weight is a good trade off.

A wheelers's rig, they cage is constantly used and abused, and need to come back for more. Thicker, "tougher" and increased durability (toughness is actually a technical turn). More weight is a acceptable trade off vs the little bit of weight savings, especially per the cost.

"DOM" is a "tougher" material than standard HREW, hence it is the preferred choice.


Now, it appears that "chromo" is becoming popular for link material (in heavy wall thickness) not for weight savings, but for the "spring link" properties that can be obtained after the proper heat-treating.


Web-Wheelers opinion with a little bit of engineering background (but its been a while since those classes)
________
Easy Vape Whips
 
Last edited:
Like I said $$$$$.

In the last chassis I looked at doing some of the push/pull interior bars in .060 cromoly to save weight.....once I saw the price jump:eeek:...I settled on DOM....except where I used Aluminum:D
 
.....and here I am standing on the pipe tubber pooper, wondering WTF is happening.:D

P.S. If I find out that my next (distant, near future) DOM chassis can't take the abuse I put my current tubber through.......I'm gonna be pissed.:whip:
 
But for a layman cage DOM(1020) should be strong enough at 80kPSI,,,,the 4130 gets you to 100kPSI. That last bit doesn't merrit the extra cash IMO.

Most excellent. If you treat it then yer twice as strong as dom, But heat makes stuff move and doing a chassis would be insanely expensive.

I got to wondering a few years ago, Dustin Webster had a new chassis tigged up from chromo but he didnt treat it...was it too expensive to have it treated, or what...got me to thinking why.

Id love to have a unpainted chromo chassis that was treated...Or a ss chassis...that would be blingin

To finish my rambling...wheeling and straight line racing are not similar in any way shape or form.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top