You tell me what you se here...
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=451622&cache=1
A excellently built rig and the rocks none the worse for wear :skratchhead:
O.K., let me get this straight.... the perception of mudding by the media is people blasting through the mud & that's bad mmmkay?
But not a word is said about the truck manufactures depiction of "4-wheeling" in the ads they produce?
You know the ones that show them blasting through the river at 40 or up a hill full throttle............and the media says not one word, hmmmm
(Professional driver on a closed course)
:redneck:
Yup...
And dust.
And Rubber burned into the rocks which is all but a permanent defacement.
And Paint embedded in the rocks.
And broken rocks
And scratches and gouges in the rocks.
And oil spills.
And Human waste.
And trash.
And noise.
And...
In a desert environment the "scars" on the rocks will out last the typical human.
IF in accessing these rocks the vehicle was driven across the desert the tracks can easily cause both wind and water erosion due to damage of the extremely sensitive desert top soil.
There are places in CA, NV, AZ where the tracks are more then 60-years old.
You want more? Those are the easy ones that I've already heard in the Eco community... :booo:
Agreed that both leave evidence.
In the spirit of the thread though, I feel like I hear more negative media comments towards the damage caused by mudding than the different style of damage caused on the rocks.
I hear things like, This part of trail was shut down for plant rejuvination... Not, this part of trail was shut down so rain could wash rubber off rocks.
Yup...
And dust.
And Rubber burned into the rocks which is all but a permanent defacement.
And Paint embedded in the rocks.
And broken rocks
And scratches and gouges in the rocks.
And oil spills.
And Human waste.
And trash.
And noise.
And...
In a desert environment the "scars" on the rocks will out last the typical human.
IF in accessing these rocks the vehicle was driven across the desert the tracks can easily cause both wind and water erosion due to damage of the extremely sensitive desert top soil.
There are places in CA, NV, AZ where the tracks are more then 60-years old.
You want more? Those are the easy ones that I've already heard in the Eco community... :booo:
O.K., let me get this straight.... the perception of mudding by the media is people blasting through the mud & that's bad mmmkay?
But not a word is said about the truck manufactures depiction of "4-wheeling" in the ads they produce?
You know the ones that show them blasting through the river at 40 or up a hill full throttle............and the media says not one word, hmmmm
You couldn't be more wrong, I have a TJ for wheeling and I have a Fullsize '71 Chevy for mudding, the mudpits at our annual event is the biggest part of the obstacle course, I think it would be just as big if we only provided the mud pits, I grew up mudding and if it didn't take out u-joints and bearings so bad, I would still do it today. I have to include the fact that I grew up in Eastern Washington, so I am not liberalized enough to call it anything else.Muddin is for folks that don't go wheelin.
You couldn't be more wrong, I have a TJ for wheeling and I have a Fullsize '71 Chevy for mudding, the mudpits at our annual event is the biggest part of the obstacle course, I think it would be just as big if we only provided the mud pits, I grew up mudding and if it didn't take out u-joints and bearings so bad, I would still do it today. I have to include the fact that I grew up in Eastern Washington, so I am not liberalized enough to call it anything else.
But you are taking it out of contex--we were talking about the "rig"
I have played in the rocks for some times--even making the long treck down to the hammers twice. This last time I saw zero evidence of me being down there last time. One thing about rocks---a good rain storm and most the evidence is gone--or even the sun beating down on the rocks can do wonders---can you get that from dirt or a medow?
But yes no matter what we make an impact on the land--its how we impact it thats pf the importance...
I'm with you on that oneOh, I see...
My bad.
Which 'RIG' is more lame a Mudder or a Rocker?
Hmmm... that is a tough one.
Based on the comments in this thread and on this board the 'correct' answer I know should be the Mudder. :worship:
The way that I prefer to wheel a rock buggy is one of the least capable, least comfortable, candyassed toys going:flipoff:
I completely enjoy building them, and watching them:awesomework: I just have no desire to own something so limited!
The Mudder, at least my daffynition of one, would be a better choice all around and of the two it would be my choice:beer:
Oh well, that's just me:looser:
I'm with you on that one