Rockwells607 said:Rockwell
russelld said:Rockwells are tough yes, but NONE of the badass bouncers are running them. For what reason I dont know but I fig they know more than I do so im trying to run what seems to work.
ibrokeit said:Yes, NONE of the rockbouncers run them. Or are the first to climb bounty hills with them.
SHOW GIRL CONQUERS DISNEY BOUNTY HILL!
Neal3000 said:Are you talking front or rear or both?
liv2mx said:Cory just did Dana 80's front and back.they weighed them and a Dana 60. The built 80 was over 100 pounds lighter then a built 60. Sure a 14 bolt would be lighter yet.this is with a billet spool,47 spline rcv,s,Wildwood brakes,aluminum hubs.
Neal3000 said:I've heard froma very knowledgible individual that the slope of the 14b gears sucks for a front application, that a hp 60 is better in that regard
Wondering myself how a 80 can be 100 lbs lighter than a 60?
TBItoy said:The only way I would agree with that is if you ran a Jana 76 kit in the front with the 35 spline pinion Currie 5.38 HP70 gears.
The gear teeth may hold up better, but it doesn't matter when you are twisting off pinion shafts.
of course, this all is relative, and only applies to high horsepower, extremely abusive applications.
But to say that 14b gears "suck" in a front application is just asinine. Especially when that has for the most part been proven otherwise.
So yal are saying a HP60 is better in the front?
Hi pinion is the correct way to build a front axle (assuming you are planning on driving forward...)
But comparing a HP60 front to a 14 bolt front is akin to comparing a HP44 front to a LP60. Which would you rather have?
russelld said:So yal are saying a HP60 is better in the front?