Concerning Reiter--up and coming.

War-Jeeper · Feb 12, 2009

Money Mark said:
Guys with buggies = not screwed, they can make it up the Poop Chute and avoid the paved road.

Guys with street rigs = not screwed, they can drive on the road (mudflaps, fender flares and bumper heights allowing, of course)

So who actually is screwed?

The people who are tearing up the trails to begin with:awesomework::corn:

Money Mark · Feb 12, 2009

I'll be fine....:redneck:

phew · Feb 12, 2009

Jay Luke said:
At the end of "Sac Up" take a right. There is already an established Quad and Bike trail. Why not widen it. Is it possible? Build a bridge or whatever for the creek crossings. This way you can avoid the "dreaded" Poop Shoot:rb: if you want by just driving up or down the gravel road like you are going to or from the OM.

We (whore guys) talked to the guy at everett powersports. Can't remember his name right now about this exact trail months ago. He himself personally said to go for it nobody really uses that trail any more.

We also talked with kim at one of our meetings with them about figuring out a way to make one long trail to take you around.

Mark m. · Feb 12, 2009

i think its all good the way it is. If your on the road you risk getting a ticket. Oh well. there is already a way to get their with only crossing the road two times. If you cant make it to bad build a better rig.
Why does everything always have to be made so everyone can make it:looser: I can't make it through the OM I want this fixed now :kiss:

crash2 · Feb 12, 2009

Mark m. said:
i think its all good the way it is. If your on the road you risk getting a ticket. Oh well. there is already a way to get their with only crossing the road two times. If you cant make it to bad build a better rig.
Why does everything always have to be made so everyone can make it:looser: I can't make it through the OM I want this fixed now :kiss:

OM is a trail--this has nothing to do with trails..

So your making a stink over this why? Your not going to use it nor help with it--so whats your point in this except to stir up drama?

crash2 · Feb 12, 2009

phew said:
We (whore guys) talked to the guy at everett powersports. Can't remember his name right now about this exact trail months ago. He himself personally said to go for it nobody really uses that trail any more.

We also talked with kim at one of our meetings with them about figuring out a way to make one long trail to take you around.

I would assume mike Liebold(sp). But as stated by the DNR. No new trails by there hands or knowledge will be done. That point was make perfectly clear last night.

War-Jeeper · Feb 12, 2009

crash said:
I would assume mike Liebold(sp). But as stated by the DNR. No new trails by there hands or knowledge will be done. That point was make perfectly clear last night.

David put extra stress on this exact point, and seemed just as frustrated about it as we are

crash2 · Feb 12, 2009

War-Jeeper said:
David put extra stress on this exact point, and seemed just as frustrated about it as we are

His eyes kinda rolled back in his head when we started throwing ideas out,lol... He wants to do more but he cannot.

War-Jeeper · Feb 12, 2009

crash said:
His eyes kinda rolled back in his head when we started throwing ideas out,lol... He wants to do more but he cannot.

I wouldnt want to be in his position thats for sure

uke:

Binder · Feb 12, 2009

War-Jeeper said:
I wouldnt want to be in his position thats for sureuke:

How long do you guys think he will keep humoring you before he just says "that's enough" and makes things easier on himself?

crash2 · Feb 12, 2009

Binder said:
How long do you guys think he will keep humoring you before he just says "that's enough" and makes things easier on himself?

I dunno. We don't seem to be the ones creating any havok for him.

His frustrations don't lie with us--but the system and how/what he is able to do. Thats where the frustrations come from.

iceman1 · Feb 12, 2009

crash said:
I would assume mike Liebold(sp). But as stated by the DNR. No new trails by there hands or knowledge will be done. That point was make perfectly clear last night.

that trail is already there,, so it's not new,,would that make a difference?

War-Jeeper · Feb 12, 2009

Binder said:
How long do you guys think he will keep humoring you before he just says "that's enough" and makes things easier on himself?

crash said:
I dunno. We don't seem to be the ones creating any havok for him.

His frustrations don't lie with us--but the system and how/what he is able to do. Thats where the frustrations come from.

Ya exactly, its not us. Its his superiors and "other" agencies that wont let him do anything at this point

War-Jeeper · Feb 12, 2009

iceman said:
that trail is already there,, so it's not new,,would that make a difference?

NO modifying of trails either. Basically no building at all

phew · Feb 12, 2009

crash said:
I would assume mike Liebold(sp). But as stated by the DNR. No new trails by there hands or knowledge will be done. That point was make perfectly clear last night.

yes that his name like i said this was awhile ago. So if thats how they feel on the subject now then i guess it's a no go. Now this is just a question don't freak out would it really be considered creating a new trail since it already exists and is just not a popular trail.

War-Jeeper · Feb 12, 2009

phew said:
yes that his name like i said this was awhile ago. So if thats how they feel on the subject now then i guess it's a no go. Now this is just a question don't freak out would it really be considered creating a new trail since it already exists and is just not a popular trail.

Read my above post:awesomework: