CHOP SHOP
Well-Known Member
The PNW represents 2500+ people, so yes the input was from 2500 or so people
so all 2500 people voted to let the DNR bend all 2500 of them over that night?
sounds fair sign me up!
The PNW represents 2500+ people, so yes the input was from 2500 or so people
just stating what I see. :looser:
I never said I was smart.:fawkdancesmiley:
just representing the dum redneck assholes of the northwest not the PNW.:redneck:
sorry if I sounded smart at any point earlier.:booo:
so all 2500 people voted to let the DNR bend all 2500 of them over that night?
sounds fair sign me up!
Nancy has listened so far to all who have talked to her. thats all we needed for them to reconsider this.
the PNW had nothing to with getting this lifted till further input. too busy JEEP racing maybe?:looser:
wake up dude.
It is called a FOCUS MEETING, not an election, Have you been to a focus meeting? No voting at any that I have seen. It is a time when the land managers get together with the users and they discuss the problems they have and what they intend to do to resolve these problems, and if you are lucky enough to have someone like Nancy involved they may ask for a little imput, if you recall the original thread, Gibby convinced them to make the restrictions larger than what DNR originally came up with. The restrictions were NEVER written in stone, the PNW was as surprised as everyone else at the Meeting, and have been in negotiations ever since.so all 2500 people voted to let the DNR bend all 2500 of them over that night?
sounds fair sign me up!
The PNW4WDA has not had an opportunity to even discuss this issue formally to present an position. The focus group meeting was discussed at our last Region 2 meeting, the delegate were instructed to take it back the clubs for discussion at the next meeting. We haven't had a meeting since and will not have one until after the upcoming focus group meeting. If you want input on that front you CAN attend these region meetings as a guest, you just don't get to vote as a non-member.
There are a number of people in favor of the restriction, they just haven't been very vocal here.
I have been trying to contact Nancy with a variety of question that I'd like answers to, prior to the meeting but so far, I've not heard back.
My personal best option at this point.
1) Leave the 82" width restriction as that is the width of the rub rails on the bridges. The bridges were built with this as a maximum width. You also have to undrstand that what WE consider fitting is not consistent with what the DNR considers fitting and 82" IS probably too wide already.
2) Eliminate the length restiction, make it a RECOMMENDATION.
3) Provide the DNR in writing with a guaranteed work party schedule that will meet their needs for maintenance on the trail. Agree to review this on an annual basis to show that the trail deterioration is not continuing
4) Search for options for a new SWB trail that has restrictions that will be willing adhered to and enforced. I suggest reclassying the mainline as an unmaintained access road and replacing that lost milage with a new trail that follows an old skidder trail so that the ecological impact and review requiments would be at a minimum.
5) Invest time and money to build the Rainier Vista and rock crawl areas that are open to the larger and better built vehicles, which will take some of the usage stress off the busywild.
is this an informed warning, or just personal opinion?
So, does width restriction refer to just the fullsize rigs or all the people out there using fullsize alxes under their "smaller" rigs???
Your forgeting one thing Brad. The 4 users that were at the meeting didnt represent 4 users they represented the PNW4WDA and it 2500 or so member familys.
we have been the only ones to bother showing up and doing something besides bitching on a website. Go figure
I joined this site around the same time as this meeting and would of been there if were posted in gibbys threads. he is the rep, right. but the meeting was posted in 426riders threads with no replies and no bumps.
I drove home from the shop at about 7:30 or 8 and saw all the cars at the fire station and thought, I wonder whats going on at the fire station to myself. then later that night DALE not 426rider posted up the results of the meeting----leading us to this now.
x2 I am not trying to run fullsizes down the busy.
and support the width restriction, just not the wheelbase restriction. long rigs climb better and dont dig as much. yes they might rub more. IMO rubs are less important than chewed roots and erosion.
this plan is PERFECT imo.
It must be a cold day in Hell cause Brad just agreed with me on somthing.:cheer:
Well, I'm 82" in my K5... Very capable to do busy... I'm fullsize... Maybe I'll carry a tape measure to be safe...
Well, I'm 82" in my K5... Very capable to do busy... I'm fullsize... Maybe I'll carry a tape measure to be safe...
Why's that???
Well, I'm 82" in my K5... Very capable to do busy... I'm fullsize... Maybe I'll carry a tape measure to be safe...