Stuntman Autoworks
Well-Known Member
So why use unit bearings on the rear? Cheaper than buying spindles? Or did you want them for ease of replacement and maintenance?
d_daffron said:Well dangit, Yellow was the goal unfortunately youre not the first person to say its green, one of us must be colorblind or something
Simple and cheap. Every parts store in the world has those bearings. If I didn't already have the 300m rcv I would have did exactly what he did when I swapped my new rear in last year. The problems I had with my rear is it bent the spindle/to be area because the truss ran as far out as it could. I think this design would eliminate alot of that.Stuntman Autoworks said:So why use unit bearings on the rear? Cheaper than buying spindles? Or did you want them for ease of replacement and maintenance?
I'm not sure if theyre necessarily cheaper than spindles, but the advantages areStuntman Autoworks said:So why use unit bearings on the rear? Cheaper than buying spindles? Or did you want them for ease of replacement and maintenance?
I picked up on the joke, thanks for the compliments.muddinmetal said:Dude, I'm just busting your balls. You have a badass rig and should be very proud of what you have accompliahed
They came off ebay $33 each. I wasnt a big fan of the "rainbow" tip but they changed colors pretty quick once they warmed up. I have to say theyre pretty quiet until you get on it hard. Heres a link to the ebay add.rugger99 said:Do you happen to remember the muffler brand / part number you used to replace the ones you originally had ? I need a small one similar to what you have.
d_daffron said:I'm not sure if theyre necessarily cheaper than spindles, but the advantages are
1. interchangeability, all four corners have the same unit bearings
2. Ability to run 40spline with no mods or expensive parts.
3. Strength/repairability. And this is definately debatable. In a unit bearing setup there is no spindle to bend. The load is pretty much transferred directly from the bearings to the housing. If I was to find a way to tear it up most likely it could be repaired by simply removing the 4 bolts that hold the bearing on and replacing the bearing. Its not like I'm going to put 100,000 miles on it and wear the bearing out anyway.
I picked up on the joke, thanks for the compliments.
They came off ebay $33 each. I wasnt a big fan of the "rainbow" tip but they changed colors pretty quick once they warmed up. I have to say theyre pretty quiet until you get on it hard. Heres a link to the ebay add.
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F291838528308
BUG-E J said:Simple and cheap. Every parts store in the world has those bearings. If I didn't already have the 300m rcv I would have did exactly what he did when I swapped my new rear in last year. The problems I had with my rear is it bent the spindle/to be area because the truss ran as far out as it could. I think this design would eliminate alot of that.
Your hung up on those ****ing trailing arms aren't youEddyj said:Are you satisfied with the performance/quality of rear suspension?
BUG-E J said:Your hung up on those ****ing trailing arms aren't you
I'd be angry too if I had a manual transmission and rockwell'sEddyj said:Listen here, I'm not going to mess up this mans build thread...
But I sure as hell ain't taking no crap from you the damn "Nickelback of rockbouncers."
I think I see what youre getting at, yes I am very happy with my trailing arm setup. The only problem I have with it is too much travel. I ended up having to use limit straps to limit travel and keep from over travelling the universal joints in the rear driveshaft. I know I could grind the CV and get more travel out of it but it seems like overkill, plus I dont want to weaken the CV.Eddyj said:Are you satisfied with the performance/quality of rear suspension?